Some possible misfunctionings to mention
Posted: 24 Apr 2013 11:45
Hello,
NOTE: I POST THIS IN ENGLISH SO THAT IT CAN BE USED BY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE USERS. HOPE IT IS USEFUL THIS WAY
After having tested Nano in demo for some time now, please note some "misfunctionings" (if I can call it so) I have encountered, I thank you in advance for your attention and for a solution.
1) Sometimes, the button backtesting doesn't react, without explanation, no BT window opens, nothing happens. Then by pressing walkforward and cancelling this screen, if one press backtesting again it does work....
2) Use of walk forward: but sometimes instead of walk forward I get nano trader system message "encounter improper argument", doesn't say what, so impossible to get out of this state, have to close Nano by use of the system's "stop process" as there is no return to Nano main screen possible !
3) Sometimes the backtesting refuses to work but at the level of the BT window: when pressing start is says "all parameters are fixed, there is nothing to optimize"; but when one changes one parameter manually and puts back the original value, the backtesting does work....
4) Often times there can be very small interruptions of the internet connection, this happens everywhere unfortunately; this causes Nano to crash and there is no alternative than to close everyting and to restart, even with "automatic reconnection" checked.
But then:
* during some period of time the studies haven't functioned, so this means loss of control and increased risk as one cannot look constantly at the screen (or then there is no sense in auto order).
* the pending orders (e.g. brackets) are still there but it is impossible to restart the corresponding study in automatic mode without cancelling them first.
* The study then initiates new pending orders but there are not the same so where is the stability in the optimization of the model ?
It happens also the Nano stops responding, without explanation, after waiting 30 minutes, no change, no reason given,..and the effects are the same as for a lost connection.
Looking forward to your/other users' comments
Best regards
JP Grossar
NOTE: I POST THIS IN ENGLISH SO THAT IT CAN BE USED BY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE USERS. HOPE IT IS USEFUL THIS WAY
After having tested Nano in demo for some time now, please note some "misfunctionings" (if I can call it so) I have encountered, I thank you in advance for your attention and for a solution.
1) Sometimes, the button backtesting doesn't react, without explanation, no BT window opens, nothing happens. Then by pressing walkforward and cancelling this screen, if one press backtesting again it does work....
2) Use of walk forward: but sometimes instead of walk forward I get nano trader system message "encounter improper argument", doesn't say what, so impossible to get out of this state, have to close Nano by use of the system's "stop process" as there is no return to Nano main screen possible !
3) Sometimes the backtesting refuses to work but at the level of the BT window: when pressing start is says "all parameters are fixed, there is nothing to optimize"; but when one changes one parameter manually and puts back the original value, the backtesting does work....
4) Often times there can be very small interruptions of the internet connection, this happens everywhere unfortunately; this causes Nano to crash and there is no alternative than to close everyting and to restart, even with "automatic reconnection" checked.
But then:
* during some period of time the studies haven't functioned, so this means loss of control and increased risk as one cannot look constantly at the screen (or then there is no sense in auto order).
* the pending orders (e.g. brackets) are still there but it is impossible to restart the corresponding study in automatic mode without cancelling them first.
* The study then initiates new pending orders but there are not the same so where is the stability in the optimization of the model ?
It happens also the Nano stops responding, without explanation, after waiting 30 minutes, no change, no reason given,..and the effects are the same as for a lost connection.
Looking forward to your/other users' comments
Best regards
JP Grossar